Restore Our Schools

Paper-First Literacy

Teachers over screens

"Put the teacher back in the center of the classroom. Technology is a powerful tool, but it should never be a substitute for teaching. It is a tool, not a tutor."

Dave Henderson
The Challenge
The Current Reality

The Screen-First Classroom

Over the past decade, our public school system has increasingly relied on screens as the primary vehicle for education. In many classrooms, digital devices and software programs have transitioned from being supplemental learning aids to acting as the primary instructors.

This over-reliance on technology is having a devastating impact on our students' attention spans, mental health, and reading comprehension. When a Chromebook becomes a substitute for direct instruction, we lose the most critical component of education: the connection between a teacher and a student. Furthermore, the constant presence of unmonitored devices and smartphones in the classroom creates an environment of perpetual distraction, making deep, focused learning nearly impossible.

Systemic Deficit Active Obstacle

Devastating Impact

Our students' attention spans, mental health, and reading comprehension are suffering under constant screen exposure, replacing constructive human interaction with passive scrolling.

Click highlighted words to analyze the impact
The Action Plan
The Action Plan

Dave's Proposed "Paper-First" Plan

01 Books Over Bytes
02 Eliminate Distractions
03 Empower Educators
Strategic Specification: Initiative 01

Books Over Bytes

Dave will advocate for policies that prioritize physical books, handwriting, and printed materials for core instructional time, specifically in reading and math. Technology will be treated as an intentional supplement, not the default medium for every assignment.

Scope of Work & Objectives
Re-prioritize physical books, paper handouts, and handwritten tasks during math and reading hours.
Relegate digital devices to intentional, supplemental aids instead of automatic instructors.
Provide teachers with high-quality printed curriculum resources for core subjects.
The Evidence
Evidence & Research

Why Paper-First Makes Sense in a Digital Age

Case Study 01 Paper vs. Digital Study
Case Study 02 Inverted U-Curve
Case Study 03 Bell-to-Bell Cell Free
Analytical Abstract

Reading on Paper vs. Digital Study

In 2019 Virginia Clinton did a comprehensive meta-analysis on the differences in reading on paper vs. reading on screens. The results are as you might expect: students have better comprehension and score significantly higher on paper vs. digital.

Certified Case File Wiley Database

Higher Comprehension

Review Study Source
Next Platform Page